The
dream of many musicians is to land the coveted “deal,” the record deal to be
exact. I remember dreaming as a teenager of “getting signed” to Columbia
records, home of many of my favourite artists at the time. I was impressed by
the calibre of performer and the swanky marketing their artists had. Nowadays, it seems the role of labels is changing in the industry they've essentially created. Upon reading the blogs of colleagues
commenting on the issues surrounding copyright, I see two major ideas that are
central to all of them as fans. They
love music and they want free and equal access to it. Period. When I say free, I don’t mean they are
unwilling to pay, in fact it has been quite the contrary. Although they have downloaded music, Derek, at
Underground Radio, David
at Picture of Interest, and Meg
at Animated Films, all report that they gladly and intentional purchase
music only from their favourite artists, as a show of support. In addition to this, they buy merchandise and
attend live shows. I talk a lot about
the agency of the artist in determining how the music reaches the fans. This is not done with out a synergistic
marketing network that is in place solely for the distribution of music. These include, radio, music television, and
good ol’ fashioned word of mouth. As
long as the can artists get music to the fans, I see that other aspects
of this industry are just as relevant if not more so the artists
themselves.
I often listen to Toronto’s Jazz FM, which has listeners from all
over the world via the Internet, and then there’s satellite radio. Follow
blogger David posted an
interesting suggestion about a music subscription service to appease the
label hounds (I have wondered about this one since during the Napster days.).
Vevo and YouTube have pretty much replaced music television channels, most of
the music channels still have awards telecasts, and documentaries that cover
artists. Yes we can stream MP3s from our
car stereos, but these “old” still provide effective outlets to experience
music from all eras by people who are just as in love with music as we are. My
girl Becky from Psyched About Music commented on my last post singing the praises of
artist centric independent
labels and rightly so! With the web, these labels have the chance to give
artist great exposure at very little cost. Will they need to rely so much on
copyrights? I don't think so. One of my recent discoveries (being
a mommy, I kind of live under a rock, okay a play pen, but it’s okay.) was a
video of a live performance of her song “Breathe Me” by Australian singer Sia in a radio station.
What a perfect example of the artist
being simultaneously local and international in a single performance. Then
here’s American pop “idol” Kelly Clarkson singing a cover of the same song
in concert. Now in the spirit of
sharing, I’m all for artist-to-artist acknowledgement of work, but most music
competitions are and YouTube stars are dedicated to cover songs (and to her credit Sia has song on The Great Gastby soundtrack). My colleagues have caused me
to question, is there really a need to get a handle on something that is always
moving? As it gets more and more
difficult to enforce restrictive laws, there are many ways artists can get their
music out that demand new approaches by the big record labels.
I listen to Jazz FM in the car :)
ReplyDeleteAs do I my friend. As do I. ;)
Delete